[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:No Patrick... you couldn't.

You've had over 50 years to explain that "photographic anomaly" - all believers have had that much time... and there's NO EXPLANATION ANYWHERE FROM ANYONE that makes sense out of that object.

Only the critics can credibly explain who put it there, when it was put there, on who's orders, and provide a credible reason why it was put there.

Yes Ben, I could.

Still making assertions you can't back up.

Didn't explain the fact that NO-ONE in the last 50 years has ever done what you claim to be able to do...

Patrick C Wrote:I just can't be bothered. You are a believer in pro conspiracy nonsense in this case and you are an extreme sensationalist plot supporter. You see a problem under every stone.

Such amazing cowardice, eh Patrick?

Patrick C Wrote:We have been here over and over.

Yep... critics listing the evidence, and believers such as yourself running from it. (even as they claim that they 'could', if they wanted to... answer it.

I do hope that you're not seriously expecting anyone to believe this...

Patrick C Wrote:There was ONE head shot and it came from the rear. Period. If you want to believe in fairy stories that is your prerogative.

And yet, you keep running from anything and everything that demolishes your positions...

Why is that, Patrick?