[Ben Holmes]

(02-08-2017, 03:58 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  All your beliefs simply aren't supported by the evidence...

If they were, you'd not be required to lie so consistently.

You've been schooled REPEATEDLY on the speed of firing that CE-139 was capable of - YET YOU CONTINUE TO KEEP RIGHT ON LYING ABOUT IT!

Why is that, Patrick?

No answer.

Patrick KNOWS he's been caught in a lie again, he KNOWS BEYOND ALL DOUBT that CE-139 was NEVER cycled at 1.7 seconds...
 

(02-08-2017, 03:34 PM)Patrick C Wrote:   

(02-08-2017, 03:58 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(02-08-2017, 03:34 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Which is why all the major investigations concluded there was no conspiracy - albeit the question mark over the HSCA and the dictabelt "evidence"......

You're lying again, Patrick. Most importantly, YOU KNOW YOU'RE LYING.

I'm amused that you apparently don't care if your lies are labeled thus, and YOU are labeled a liar, because you continue to post lies that you KNOW that I'll point out.

Why is that, Patrick?

I do not care what you call me Ben as I do not value your opinions on the JFK assassination. I have posted in the past that your bog standard response to almost all posts is to call the poster a coward or a liar - is tedious and juvenile and indicative of your standard of education and ability to debate - the latter is virtually nil. 

I don't "call" you a liar, I merely point out the FACT that you're a liar.

And everytime I do - YOU NEVER ATTEMPT TO DEFEND YOUR LIE!

So it's clear that you know you've been caught again - yet you keep right on doing so... and that fact speaks to a basically dishonest nature.
 

(02-09-2017, 12:10 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  The so called issue over how fast the rifle could be fired is frankly irrelevant. There were only two shots that stuck Kennedy and they did so a full 5+ seconds apart. The first of those shots passed through Connally - as it had to unless it struck the car - but that did not happen.

If the issue of how fast the rifle could be fired is "irrelevant" - THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP LYING ABOUT IT?

It's clearly HIGHLY RELEVANT if believers such as yourself continually lie about the speed that CE-139 could be fired. Indeed, had it been capable of faster speed, the SBT likely would never have been invented... there would have been no need for it.

Now, an HONEST man would admit that the recorded speed of CE-139 was 2.3 seconds. And wouldn't keep trying to get that speed to a lower figure... then call it "irrelevant."

But you're not an honest man, are you Patrick?