[Ben Holmes]

Quote:"No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building." (WCR 61)

Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America does accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply lying...

And even WCR Supporters realize this - hence the constant effort to diminish the numbers of witnesses to shots coming from the knoll. McAdams lied about it, and Patrick defended that lie - then when proven wrong, ran away.

No WCR Supporter is honest enough to even state that the above statement by the WCR is "wrong" - let alone admit that it's an outright lie.

Henry Sienzant Wrote:Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as you claim.

This is typical for a WCR Supporter - simply an outright lie about what someone has posted. Henry can't quote me saying anything of the sort, yet he can't admit that the Warren Commission simply lied about the witness testimony for the Knoll shots.

Mark Lane was ABSOLUTELY CORRECT to point out the massive numbers of witnesses who, on 11/22 or 11/23 - before the official theory began to coalesce, pointed to the knoll, rather than to the TSBD.

Mark is running from that topic right now - absolutely REFUSING to assert what he implies, that there's only 20 knoll witnesses. He knows the evidence well enough to know that I have the names & citations ready to go - should he be foolish enough to publicly state what he's been implying.

[Mark Ulrik]

Ben Holmes Wrote:Mark is running from that topic right now - absolutely REFUSING to assert what he implies, that there's only 20 knoll witnesses. He knows the evidence well enough to know that I have the names & citations ready to go - should he be foolish enough to publicly state what he's been implying.

Quit trying to bait me, Ben. It's very unbecoming.

[Ben Holmes]

(08-09-2016, 12:29 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:Mark is running from that topic right now - absolutely REFUSING to assert what he implies, that there's only 20 knoll witnesses. He knows the evidence well enough to know that I have the names & citations ready to go - should he be foolish enough to publicly state what he's been implying.

Quit trying to bait me, Ben. It's very unbecoming.

Quit running from your own false claims...

It was YOU who made the claim listing the numbers... you have to back it up, or admit the truth.

There were even MORE witnesses on 11/22 and 11/23 who pointed to the knoll than even Mark Lane referred to.

And until you can show a list of the witnesses and what they said, and PROVE THAT MARK LANE WASN'T TELLING THE TRUTH when he asserted that a majority of those witnesses pointed to the Grassy Knoll - it's you that's provably lying.

You can run, Mark - but you can't hide in a public forum.