Posts: 955
Threads:276
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
35
Stance Critic
Re: Basic Facts Of The Case
Patrick C Wrote:Brennan could never have been absolutely certain that the man was Oswald - it was too high up.
The Dealey Plaza web cam gives a reasonably clear picture of the street below - and you could not really pick out spefic individuals below unless you knew them.
I have been in that window with Larry Harris down below in 1983 and he said he could really only see that I was white, dark hair, and young - I was 23 at the time. This was before they made a museum out of it.
But Brennan DID get the basics correct.....
In his book of course he is reasonably clear that he thought it was Oswald, but he could not be 100% and so rightly he declined to give the positive ID. He was also scared out of his wits......
Brennan was so "scared" that he immediately ran to the nearest police officer to tell him what he knew.
The earliest statements are generally considered more accurate, as I'm sure you're aware of... before any possible intimidation, or thoughtful change...
Nor did Brennan get the "basics correct" - I rather doubt that the corroborating testimony regarding the assassin's clothing was wrong - and OSWALD WAS NOT WEARING IT.
Therefore, Brennan's EARLIEST statements were absolutely correct, his later statements provably WRONG. Your "opinon" to the contrary is meaningless.