[Ben Holmes]

(09-05-2016, 11:16 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  Which part of "there is no page reference" do you not comprehend...?

Niether Mike M nor I claim that more people stated there were 2 shots than 3. What I stated was that the number of people who thought there were only two shots decreased as some of them changed their minds as they were influenced by media reports.

Mike M in his book does not address Mark Lane's claim that the majority of witnesses stated the GK was the source of the shots on 22 and 23 Nov 1963. That is my assertion and it does not come from a single book. It is based on my knowledge of the case and appraisal of the witness statements. 

Oh and I am not  running from anything Holmes, I just consider exchanging comments with you on the JFK case laregly pointless because your logic is frankly a joke.

You quite desperately keep lying... Nowhere have you been able to quote me saying what you claim.

What IS the topic is simple... Here it is again:

 

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:But, as Mark Lane pointed out many years ago - the witnesses who were on the record in the first two days, 11/22 and 11/23 - quite overwhelmingly pointed to the Grassy Knoll.

Bull shit - no they did not.

Ben Holmes Wrote:No believer has been able to refute that simple fact.

Oh, if I could be bothered I could easily do that. Mike Majerus certainly has. It's just a question of homework and application.

Now, even the most literately challenged person sees that you claimed that Mike Majerus addressed the issue raised by Mark Lane - that the majority of the first two days of documented eyewitnesses pointed to the Grassy Knoll.

It doesn't do anything to merely claim that Majerus didn't address it, WHEN YOU PREVIOUSLY CLAIMED THAT HE DID!

What is needed is your acknowledgement that you lied.

It's really just that simple.

I'm sure you'll argue that you didn't understand what was clearly written... or you'll argue that you weren't paying attention to the topic.

I frankly don't care HOW you explain it... but you WILL address your lie, because I'll simply keep bringing it up.