[Ben Holmes]

R. Anderson Wrote:

Quote:Why don't you tell us about what a spectacular witness Helen Markham was to the Tippit shooting?

Instead we can talk about your boy Lane putting words in her mouth and thereby committing perjury.

It would be wonderful if believers could ever support this frequently seen assertion.

What words did Mark Lane put in Helen Markham's mouth? Where's the documentation of this? (I've several times posted online virtually the entire 'Rush To Judgment' - and never seem to have any refutations with Mark Lane's words right in front of them...)

And it seems downright mean (for those who've read Helen Markham's testimony) to suggest that believers actually must believe her.

Helen Markham was a kook. And even believers would be forced to admit it rather than defend her testimony.

[Ben Holmes]

R. Anderson Wrote:

Quote:Lane put no words in her mouth, that is balderdash too. Lane recorded that interview with the "screwball" Mrs Markham.

Why did he request immunity to appear before the WC on this point if he didn't? And yes, I've read the interview.....it's downright embarrassing to anyone with an ounce of integrity.

I note for the record that instead of merely citing what words Mark Lane had "put" in Helen Markham's mouth - Anderson demonstrated his cowardice by making a nonsensical argument. Indeed, had he merely read the testimony, it would be crystal clear why Mark Lane was asking for immunity... he was being asked to break the lawyer-client privilege, and could have been prosecuted for it.

Here's the relevant portion:

Mr. RANKIN. Do you have any writing from Mrs. Markham in connection with the interview that you referred to in your testimony?
Mr. LANE. Any document which Mrs. Markham wrote? Is that the question?
Mr. RANKIN. Either that or anything that she signed which purports to be her statement or affidavit or other recording.
Mr. LANE. I have nothing that she signed or that she wrote.
Mr. RANKIN. Do you have anything that you made up yourself from any interview with her?
Mr. LANE. Yes; I do.
Mr. RANKIN. Do you have that with you?
Mr. LANE. No; I do not.
Mr. RANKIN. Will you describe that document? Is it a paper or a tape recording, or what form does it have?
Mr. LANE. It is a tape recording and a transcript of the tape recording in writing.
Mr. RANKIN. Was the tape recording made by you?
Mr. LANE. I think we are now moving into an area where I would prefer not to answer questions, quite frankly. I have given to the Commission the results of my investigation, and I think that the Commission are aware of the fact that I have an attorney-client relationship existing. The Commission is now asking for working papers of an attorney. The Supreme Court has been quite plain, I think, on the question of the sanctity of working documents of attorneys. And I think, therefore, that the questions are no longer in a proper area.I might also indicate to the Commission that when I was retained by Marguerite Oswald to represent the interests of her son before this Commission, and the Commission declined to permit me to so represent Lee Oswald, it made it impossible for me to conduct the kind of cross-examination before this Commission of witnesses that I would have ordinarily conducted, and that entire conversation would have been in the presence of the Commission, obviously, had I been permitted to function as counsel for my client.
Mr. RANKIN. Will you describe to the Commission the attorney and client relationship that you claim to exist?
Mr. LANE. Yes. I should think the Commission would be well aware of that since I wrote to the Commission on the very day that I was retained and sent, as I recall, an affidavit from my client, detailing the purpose, the purpose of my being retained. I think that was during the very early days of this year.
Mr. RANKIN. Who was the client?
Mr. LANE. Marguerite Oswald retained me to conduct an investigation in reference to the charges that were made against her son, then deceased, and to represent his interests before this Commission.
Mr. RANKIN. And do you claim that that attorney-client relationship is one that exists now?
Mr. LANE. It does exist at the present time in relationship to a matter peripheral to this investigation. It certainly did exist at the time of my discussion with Mrs. Markham, and my discussion with Mrs. Markham took place solely because of the existence of that relationship and to further that relationship.

Quite clearly, Mark Lane wasn't afraid of providing this tape recording because it would reveal that Helen Markham was testifying truthfully, and he wasn't... as Anderson would have you believe.

Indeed, everyone can read the transcript for themselves...

Anderson is a proven liar.

[Ben Holmes]

R. Anderson Wrote:lol Like I've always said about you people: you don't even recognize dishonesty when you see it. He didn't ask for immunity over some taping issue......he specifically was concerned over the issue of perjury.

You're lying again, Anderson.

I quoted Mark Lane's testimony, he was quite specific, and NOWHERE does he even slightly imply any issue of perjury... not even a WHISPER.

Mark Lane makes it ABUNDANTLY clear that his issue was lawyer-client privilege - and all believers can do is keep lying about it.

Why does the truth need a lie?

Quote even a SINGLE WORD that implied Mark Lane was "concerned over the issue of perjury."

But no-one will... certainly not Anderson...

[Ben Holmes]

R. Anderson Wrote:Again: if that's all there was to it.....he would not have insisted on immunity from prosecution for perjury before turning over that tape.

It's really that simple. This is a guy who spent a career criticizing the WC......and it turns out he lied to them. Guy had a brass set I'll give him that.

You'd think that believers would get embarrassed at being caught lying so blatantly so often.

But Anderson just keeps right on posting lies, despite the fact that he can't defend his lie by quoting ANYTHING Mark Lane said in his testimony.

Why is it that critics are citing the evidence, and believers are simply spouting their un-sourced and provably false opinion?

[Ben Holmes]

R. Anderson Wrote:

Quote:AGAIN! Lane wanted immunity because it is illegal for an attorney to record a telephone call without advising the person called that he was recording it.

Nope.

And yet, it's quite clear in his testimony... Mark Lane felt he had a right to tape record it because he was acting within the lawyer-client relationship... but he knew that the Warren Commission could prosecute him - BUT NOT FOR PERJURY - A TOPIC NEVER RAISED IN HIS TESTIMONY.

Quote:"Former Assemblyman Mark Lane asked yesterday that his testimony before the Warren Commission be sent to the At­torney General's office "for prosecution for perjury" so that he might be allowed to prove "the absolute accuracy of my testimony."

Mr. Lane, a lawyer, testified last Thursday before the com­mission investigating the as­sassination of President Ken­nedy. Chief Justice Earl War­ren told him that the commis­sion had "every reason to doubt the truthfulness" of some of Mr. Lane's testimony. Mr. Lane has been making lecture tours here and abroad on the theme that Lee H. Oswald was not the assassin.

............

Yesterday, the lawyer said in a statement that "I shall play the tape recording during this month at a public meeting to which members of the press and members of the commission will be invited." He did not give the time or place of the meeting.

He also said that he had told the commission that "if I am in­formed no prosecution will re­sult, I will make the recording available to them." He said the commission had not responded, "indicating that it is they who are seeking to suppress the facts and the tape recording, not I."

---'Warren Committee Challenged by Lane', NY Times 7/8/1964

I find it amusing that Anderson can't figure it out. Mark Lane was VERY CLEAR in his testimony why he was refusing to hand over the tape - he didn't want to be prosecuted for it - yet was willing to hand it over if the Commission would grant immunity.

LATER - when the Warren Commission insinuated that Mark Lane had lied - THAT is the time when he challenged them to back up their insinuation with prosecution - which he KNEW he would beat. He was telling the Warren Commission to put their money where their mouth was.

And, of course, there was no prosecution... nor was there any perjury that Anderson can point to...

No wonder Anderson isn't interested in facing a knowledgeable critic...

[FrankJScott]

Please try Google before asking about Updated Product Guide db01003

[FrankJScott]

Please try Google before asking about Best Product Website 6_595dd

[FrankJScott]

To the man asking about add_faiss_index, topic analysis nlp, selective token generation for few shot natural language generation, need of natural language processing, morphological segmentation nlp, natural language processing ai, faiss indexflatl2, nlp for data science, deep learning with nlp, nlp ocr, ai and natural language processing, sentiment analysis in nlp, nlp concepts, nlp based, query2box, discourse and pragmatic processing in ai, nlp 2022, natural language processing with probabilistic models, faiss algorithm, nlp industry, turing natural language generation, text summary nlp, c++ vector find index, scikit learn natural language processing, applications of nlp ppt, I suggest this read this for HNSW for generic nlp system, bloomberg nlp, negation detection nlp, nlp fraud detection, prompting nlp, sequence labelling in nlp, nlp for you, oracle nlp, yandex nlp, sap nlp, nlp preprocessing techniques, chris manning nlp, nlp rnn, image embedding vector, nlp meaning in hindi, haystack faiss, natural language processing with spark nlp, language translation using nlp, natural language generation nlg, nlp areas, structured natural language, natural language is structured data, nlp data processing, nlp meaning in english, sentiment analysis in nlp, also. See More Top Real Estate Investment In Dubai Guide 36d0b86

---

In reply to the people inquiring about natural language in computer, nlp fundamentals, udacity nlp, isai nlp, tagging nlp, natural language processing for text summarization, microsoft nlp api, spark nlp for healthcare, nlp explainable ai, kaggle natural language processing, nlp short note, query2box, natural language processing in tensorflow coursera github, nlp rule based, nlp based applications, aws natural language, net nlp, syntactic analysis nlp, vector similarity search engine, natural language understanding, nlp word, lexical processing nlp, pytorch natural language processing, nlp computer, nlp projects sentiment analysis, I recommend this my website about Semantic Similarity Search for advanced nlp, natural language processing using python, topic analysis nlp, event detection nlp, nlp legal documents, text processing applications, text normalization nlp, natural linguistic processing, nlp gpt, natural language classification, natural language processing text classification, question generation using nlp, nlp openai, vector similarity search engine, semantic processing in nlp, meaning of natural language processing, explain the working of nlp, nlp projects for final year, r index vector, faiss similarity search, natural language text, natural language processing for dummies, jurafsky nlp, keras natural language processing, speech recognition using nlp, also. See More Top Real Estate Investment In Dubai Website b869d1_

[FrankJScott]

Please try Google before asking about Top Product Website 6db0100

[FrankJScott]

To the people asking about new no deposit bonus online casino, slot games in casino, slot bonuses, best european casino online, play games slots, casino sites no deposit bonus uk, the best online slots, top rated casino games, live roulette online betting, best casino slots, games that give you money to play, baccarat casino online game, real money online casino welcome bonus no deposit, online gambling no deposit free spins, best casino real money online, live slot games, uk casino roulette, top 10 best casino, best online roulette real money, best online slot machine games, I can vouch for this get redirected here for best online casinos with real money, register online gambling, popular casino slot games, online casino operators, no deposit spin bonus, live casino games online free, recommended slot games, best online slots real money no deposit, best online casino sign up offers, mga online casino, best online blackjack sites, online gambling with credit card, casino online no deposit free spins, most best casino, slot game with free bonus, play slot games, roulette live online casino, online gambling site, casino with good welcome bonus, pay casino online, also. See More Excellent Best Casinos Info 24a936d

---

For the person inquiring about best online blackjack uk, real money online casino welcome bonus no deposit, best no deposit bonus casino uk, free spins no deposit casino online, casino games that pay real money, the best online casino for real money, online black jack gambling, no deposit registration bonus casino, us casinos with no deposit bonuses, best casino games, best slot bonus uk, live slot games, new no deposit bonus online casino, free spins welcome bonus casino, 10 bonus casino, best real online blackjack, top casino games real money, you casino, games that can give you money, no deposit bonus code, I can vouch for this casino bonus recommendations for most popular online slots, biggest casino bonuses, games slot games, best casino welcome offers, blackjack live game, free bet no deposit casino, online casino slot games, best slot games for winning, best casino games slots, best online slots no deposit, online casino sign up free spins, free sign up money online casino, gambling sites real money, top online casino reviews, slots casino real money online, bonus money casino, best online no deposit casino, one bet casino, casino bonuses uk, best no deposit bonuses for online casinos, also. See More Recommended Casino Bonus Site 3ddd2a7