[Ben Holmes]

In the Amazon Forum, Dale Hayes said: "Dr. Baden stated in no uncertain terms that the Parkland doctors were wrong in their statements, especially about the head wound - and that is not a criticism of them - they didn't clean and carefully inspect the wounds as what was done in an autopsy setting."

Of course, as I've pointed out, Dr. Baden really didn't know the case evidence. It would be difficult indeed to pack more mistakes into a single paragraph, but Dr. Baden did it.

And, of course, the autopsy prosectors who spent hours examining the body agreed with Parkland on the wound location.

But Dale cannot admit that the prosectors might be wrong on their examination - because that would undercut all medical evidence for his belief.

Dale said: "LOVE when the theorists make these charges of witness intimidation while being utterly without any substantive support for their statement - they read it somewhere and that is sufficient."

This, of course, is a lie. I've quoted the actual witnesses, as well as a newspaper article describing what can only be defined as witness intimidation. And, in honor of Dale Hayes' lie on this issue, look to the right under 'Worth Reading' - I'll soon repost what he's claimed doesn't exist... "substantive support".

Dale continues: "Anybody who has been in that window and looked down Elm St can easily see that those shots were't difficult, especially for an ex-marine with decent skill with a rifle."

And yet, three NRA rated 'Masters' couldn't do it. That fact tells the tale...