[Ben Holmes]

Bogman Wrote:... It was a domestic political conspiracy.

The evidence supporting this opinion are more tenuous and circumstantial. And Oswald’s actions that day do, IMO, point to knowledge of guilt of some kind. But following are a few of the dangling, unresolved threads that point to conspiracy:o The CIA’s ongoing obfuscation over the Oswald Mexico City tapes and photos

• The CIA’s felonious obstruction of the HSCA through George Joannides and continuing withholding of evidence on his relationship with the DRE
  
• Syliva Odio’s testimony
  
• CIA contract agent William Gaudet’s claim he saw Oswald with Guy Bannister in NO
  
• Antonio Veciana’s claim he saw David Atlee Phillips with Oswald in September in Dallas
  
• The endless multitude of anomalies in the criminal evidence, including the backward snap of the president’s head in the Zapruder film, the Parkland doctors contrary views of the head injury, the failed nitrate test, the Harper fragment, the burning of the first autopsy notes, the FBI destruction of the Oswald note, the many revised witness testimonies by the FBI, the botched autopsy, the Siebert/O’Neill testimony, the credible eyewitness testimony of a shot from the front, Ruby’s connections to organized crime, the suspicious deaths of key witnesses including Johnny Roselli, Santos Trafficante and George DM, the CIA communications by George DM before and after knowing Oswald, the moving of the bullet wound to the neck in drawings by the govt to make a shot from a sixth floor more plausible, the currently expanding view that JFK was not another in a line of Cold War presidents and had intentions to end the Cold War and make peace with Castro, etc., etc., etc.
  

It would be nice to finally get some candor from our government once and for all.

There's only two things wrong with the above statement... Silvia Odio's name is misspelled, and the "nitrate" test should have been "NAA" test.

Interestingly, I don't believe I've ever seen a reasonable and credible explanation for the famously incorrect Rydberg drawing... Dr. Humes surely knew better, and any Commission who used third-hand drawings in place of the actual photos and X-rays is incompetent, at best... and quite possibly criminally negligent.

Let the silence from the believers commence...