[Mark Ulrik]

(08-07-2016, 06:53 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-07-2016, 02:01 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-05-2016, 01:24 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-01-2016, 01:25 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  Can someone give me the lowdown on what it is, specifically, that Ben doesn't like (or understand) about McAdams' tabulation?

 

(08-05-2016, 08:01 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-05-2016, 03:04 AM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  So it's your assertion that there were only 20 witnesses that pointed to the knoll?

Careful now, Mark... I've tabulated them, so if you tell a lie, I'll be happy to point it out.

Quit playing games. I've already demonstrated that Lane's numbers are wrong. Are you denying that the 5 witnesses I gave you meet Lane's selection criteria? Are you denying that all 5 pointed to the TSBD as the source of the shots? Are you denying that Lane's "tabulation" only leaves room for 3 non-GK witnesses?

No Mark, you've not.

If YOUR numbers are right, then there should be just 20 knoll witnesses.

Non sequitur.

So you simply lied when you made the claim that "Come on. I don't need to make a complete tabulation to prove Lane wrong. I only have to find more than three (25 minus 22) witnesses known to have "given statements or affidavits on 11/22 or 11/23 about the origin of the shots" who didn't say they "believed the shots came from the knoll."

I'm getting tired of having to repeat myself over and over again. Your hero Mark Lane was wrong (in Ben Holmes terms: lied) when he claimed there were only three witnesses known to have "given statements or affidavits on 11/22 or 11/23 about the origin of the shots" who didn't say they "believed the shots came from the knoll."
 

Mark Ulrik Wrote:Lane cited only Decker Exhit 5323 and CE 2003.

You're lying again, Mark.

Here's the EXACT citations given:
 

Quote:23. See Appendix I; see also XIX, 467-543; XXIV, 198-231.

Now tell us Mark - why did you leave out 1/3 of the citations given?

There's nothing sinister about it, Ben. It's been a few years since I looked at this. Thank you for reminding me that there were more potential TSDB (and other non-GK) witnesses that Lane "forgot" about.

And why are you so afraid that you refuse to list the people who, on 11/22 and 11/23 stated that they heard the shots from whatever location? Could it be that if you did, you'd merely be making Mark Lane's point again?

I have listed five people who pointed to the TSBD. What have you done, other than flap your gums? What are you so afraid of?

An overwhelming majority of witnesses on Friday and Saturday stated that the Grassy Knoll was the location... and no matter how you twist the facts, the true fact is that it's you who's the liar... and Mark Lane merely told the truth.

Prove it. Show us your tabulation.

Document your claims, or continue to run... it makes no difference.

You see, lurkers to the forum are literate, I count on that. That's why I'm not afraid to cite the evidence.

Unlike you, I have documented my claim. Lane's numbers are wrong.

My comments in green above.