[Mark Ulrik]

(08-24-2016, 01:49 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-24-2016, 09:15 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-16-2016, 03:03 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-16-2016, 02:34 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-16-2016, 01:46 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  YOUR OWN NUMBERS prove two things... that Mark Lane counted different people than you... and that his point that the overwhelming majority of the first few days witnesses pointed to the TSBD is absolutely true.

"...his point that the overwhelming majority of the first few days witnesses pointed to the TSBD is absolutely true."

Freudian slip?

Nope... simply a mistake. Run if you wish, but you cannot refute the fact that your own numbers prove two things... that Mark Lane counted different people than you, and that in the first two days the overwhelming majority of witnesses pointed to the Grassy Knoll.

You cannot refute that.

Nor will you even try. Remember folks - my crystal ball is once again making a prediction - and Mark can't help but make it come true.

How am I supposed to refute gibberish? What my numbers prove is that Lane pulled his numbers out of his hat.

Why is it "gibberish" to point out that your own numbers prove two things... that Mark Lane counted different people than you, and that in the first two days the overwhelming majority of witnesses pointed to the Grassy Knoll...

As predicted, you refused to even try to refute that.

I predict that once again, you'll simply run away from that statement. Here it is again:

Your own numbers prove two things... that Mark Lane counted different people than you,

That's just your weasel way of admitting that his numbers are wrong.

and that in the first two days the overwhelming majority of witnesses pointed to the Grassy Knoll...

Lane's claim of "22 of 25" is demonstably wrong. Your vaguer claim of "an overwhelming majority" is unsupported. You refuse to post the tabulation you (*cough*) claim to have done. I think we all understand why.

My comments in green above.