[Mark Ulrik]

(08-25-2016, 11:58 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-25-2016, 08:52 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-24-2016, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Let's hear you acknowledge that fact, Mark. Surely you don't want to label you a coward yet again... so acknowledge in your response that there were MORE THAN 25 WITNESSES DOCUMENTED ON 11/22 & 11/23.

Sign. I've already told you that I don't know. If we were to include unpublished documents, however, then the answer would certainly be yes, but Lane is supposed to have been found his 25 witnesses in the WC volumes.

You're lying again, Mark. I've cited the actual citation from Rush to Judgment, you acknowledged that you forgot the newspaper accounts, then you go right ahead and lie about it again.

Mark Lane gave THREE citations, not only the two found in the WC volumes.

Your abject cowardice doesn't surprise me... I rather suspect that you know very well that the true numbers support Mark Lane's statement as well.

I'm sorry to have to disappoint, but I've checked the newspaper accounts cited by Lane, and there weren't any shots from the GK area in there. One of those 11 witnesses did, however, say the shots came from the TSBD.
 

(08-25-2016, 08:52 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-24-2016, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  The truth can never be embarrassing to me - you're the one running from the facts. YOUR OWN NUMBERS PROVE THAT MARK LANE'S POINT WAS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!

A bold-faced lie!

How can the truth be a lie?

Who says there is anything true about your gibberish?

You ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to acknowledge that the majority, indeed, the OVERWHELMING majority of the documented witnesses on 11/22 and 11/23 pointed to the Grassy Knoll.

Yes, CTs just love to make bold claims, but when you ask them to support it, they become defensive and often abusive.

You manage to find 5 witnesses, and you think that this proves Mark Lane wrong.

Of course, he's wrong. He pretended there were only 3 non-GK witnesses, and I gave you 5 who were not only non-GK witnesses, but explicitly pointed to the TSBD.

If you could have found more, you'd have listed them by now.

It wouldn't be difficult to find additional non-GK witnesses, but I frankly have better things to do with my time. You haven't contributed anything of value to this discussion, so you're hardly in a position to make demands. Would you, however, be willing to pay me to do the research you're too lazy to do yourself, then I'll take your offer into consideration.

Now, either admit that Mark Lane was absolutely correct in his statement that most of the witnesses documented on 11/22 & 11/23 pointed to the Grassy Knoll, or run away.

You will not be allowed to label a statement a "lie" again unless you can document it... Those are the rules.

I don't remember calling your "overwhelming majority" claim a "lie," but I have on quite a few occasions asked you to support it.

My comments in green above.