Posts: 955
Threads:276
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
35
Stance Critic
RE: Henry Sienzant Demonstrates How To Lie...
(10-13-2016, 04:27 PM)Patrick C Wrote: (10-11-2016, 01:31 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: Henry Sienzant Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:Quote:No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building." (WCR 61)
Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America does accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply lying. ...
Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as you claim.
You're lying again, Henry.
More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.
Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?
Henry has never admitted his lie, nor retracted it. Notice how subtle the lie is... with the addition of only a single word, "all" - Henry has transformed a perfectly accurate and correct statement into something he can "refute".
Patrick goes further than Henry... Patrick will simply make things up... not with the addition of a mere word, but entire sentences...
This is what believers need to do to argue the evidence.
Lie about it.
Actually Lee, I have corrected you many times on matters of fact and evidence over the years. That is an apt summary of YOUR rather than my approach on this subject.
So you are the maker upper here old boy!
Amusingly, Patrick has nothing to say about Henry's lie.
He refuses to defend it, and he refuses to publicly chastise Henry for lying.
But that's what believers do... they support each other.