[Patrick C]

Ben Holmes Wrote:I'm amused at this last statement... believers somehow believe that if virtually all pointed to one direction, then the shots must have come from one direction.

Wrong, it does mean that the shots MUST have come from one direction, it is merely persuasive that they did.

Ben Holmes Wrote:The evidence is well explained by multiple shot locations - it's not explained AT ALL by pretending only one location.

Absolute bunkum, the evidence is compelling that shots were fired from one location above and behind the limo.

Ben Holmes Wrote:Depending on how you read the statements & testimony, by some accounts the MAJORITY of witnesses place the shots coming from the Grassy Knoll. By the logic employed here - this shows that they came from the TSBD, and a majority of witnesses were mistaken.

In that instance clearly yes - but why not?

I do not agree that the account totals such as those by Thompson (39% TSBD / 52% GK), Gallanor (44% TSBD / 48% GK) are accurate though, McAdams is far more accurate in his interpretation of the witness statements and concludes 59% TSBD and 31% GK

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/shots.htm">http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/shots.htm</a><!-- m -->

TWO directions.....3%

Ben Holmes Wrote:I find such reasoning to be quite silly.

On the contrary, the reasoning is perfectly logical Ben.