[Ben Holmes]

(10-30-2016, 06:24 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:you're quite desperately conflating the two, trying to remove Dr. Burkley from the record. Then pretending it doesn't matter...

Not at all. I don't care at all which doctor Mac K got the information from and I would expect it probably was Burkeley who confirmed it at least. I expect everyone there heard several doctors say that Kennedy was dead.

Then why didn't you acknowledge it the first time?

Why do I have to drag the truth out of you?

WHY DID YOU LIE AND STATE THAT IT WAS DR. PERRY WHO GAVE KILDUFF THE INFORMATION ON THE WOUNDS?

And, of course, why do you continue to give Henry Sienzant a pass on his lying?
 

(10-30-2016, 06:24 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:Tell us Patrick, why does the truth upset you so much?

I am afraid it does not upset me at all that Oswald alone, shot JFK. It is just rather a dull conclusion with respect to the tragedy that it was for the American people and many more of us world wide.

If the truth didn't upset you so much, you'd have immediately acknowledged that the evidence shows that Kilduff got his information about JFK's wounds from Dr. Burkley.

You provably ran from that issue on multiple posts, AND THEN LIED ABOUT THAT FACT.

Tell us Patrick - why does the truth - the REAL evidence in this case - upset you so much?

Why are you desperate to avoid the source of Kilduff's description of the wounds to JFK?