[Patrick C]

(02-09-2017, 10:41 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(02-09-2017, 04:16 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Go ahead and post them - about 40 in total thought ALL the shots came from the front - that is NOT a majority.

I don't care a jot anyway. They were wrong. ALL the shots did not come from the front. The autopsy proves that the fatal head shot struck from the rear - there is a bullet hole in the back of the head. It is that simple.

Who cares whether the witnesses were right or wrong, THIS IS ABOUT YOU, PATRICK COLLINS, and your lying about the evidence in this case.

I find it amusing that you still refuse to document your claim.

So here it is, ON THE RECORD - that you refuse to document the witnesses who were documented in print in the first two days...

I should have the list posted this weekend... but it's absolutely HILARIOUS (as Henry would say) that you absolutely refuse to support your claim.

P.S. You're not going to attempt to claim you didn't understand what I've been saying... I've said it too many times now, and you've denied it too many times. The eyewitnesses WHO WERE DOCUMENTED IN PRINT in the first two days - the majority pointed to the Grassy Knoll. You've labeled that a lie, and you're going to be greatly embarrassed as I prove beyond all refutation that you've been lying.

(02-09-2017, 10:41 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  There's no need to "avoid" the "sound logic" of the above contention - it's based on a lie.

No it is not. Almost ALL of the people who thought a shot came from the Knoll, thought ALL the shots came from the Knoll. We know 2 did not.

That is the point - which you have missed - [Ad hominem removed]

(02-09-2017, 10:41 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Once one realizes that most of the witnesses documented in the first two days pointed to the Grassy Knoll, then the "sound logic" turns upside down. The "sound logic" presupposes that only one shooter was shooting - this simply isn't logical at all. There's no inherent need to restrict the number of shooters to one, other than the government's desire to avoid the fact of conspiracy.

No it does not - because those witnesses thought ALL the shots came from the Knoll - are you REALLY that dumb Ben, or do you have a language problem?

(02-09-2017, 10:41 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Tell us Patrick, WHAT EVIDENCE PROVES THAT THERE WAS NOT A SHOOTER AT THE GRASSY KNOLL?

(Let the silence begin...)

 
You cannot PROVE there was no shooter on the Knoll Ben. There could have been 5 shooters firing ice bullets and they all missed. There could have been a shooter on the Knoll who missed. The evidence does not support a frontal hit however. The evidence shows one bullet entered the back of the head.

If you want to think otherwise and believe in fairy tales, then go ahead waste your time. I am prepared to make minimal contributions to your site.

As for your GK in print / weekend witnesses being a majority - post them.

How do you know you have everything there was in print...?

I interviewed many dozens of Dallas residents including 20 + witnesses circa 1983, I was left in little doubt that the majority of people in the plaza ON THE DAY thought the shots came from high and to the rear. No surprises there as they did.

The others were simply mistaken. Simple.