[Ben Holmes]

Jean Davidson Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:If Mark Lane were as error-ridden as believers continually assert that he was, they’d have long ago CITED FOR IT.

Mark Lane told the WC, "The [paraffin] test proved, according to Mr. Curry, and the statement that he made on Saturday, November 23, to the press that Oswald had fired the murder weapon."

Once again, that’s the opposite of what the witness actually said. On 11/22 Curry said of the paraffin test results, "It only means that he fired a gun."

QUOTE
[Reporter]. That he fired a gun, Chief, not the rifle or pistol?”
Curry. That’s right. We just say a gun.
UNQUOTE

http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?...2&tab=page

Want more examples of Lane’s distortions? Just ask.

Sadly, this is the sort of sillyness that abounds in the WCR Supporter community. THEY BELIEVE that Oswald fired two weapons, a rifle and a pistol - BOTH OF WHICH were used to kill someone, thus both "murder weapons."

And when Mark Lane says it, he must have been lying.

Yet you'll NEVER find a believer who's willing to say that the Mannlicher Carcano or the pistol were NOT "murder weapons."

Yet even though they agree with Mark Lane on that point - they are still willing to label him a liar for saying so.

Has the world turned upside down? Is there any believer willing to defend the proposition that Mr. Curry was NOT trying to put a murder weapon into Oswald's hands? (as Mark Lane stated...)