[Ben Holmes]

Amusingly, Patrick still refuses to quote what Malcolm Kilfuff actually said...

He lied when he claimed that Kilduff said that Dr. Perry was "his source on the head wound."

Henry Sienzant also lied when he claimed that I'd asserted that Kilduff had viewed the body, and got his information that way... Patrick went along with that lie as well.

It would be quite easy to defend Patrick's statement - ALL HE HAS TO DO IS QUOTE KILDUFF SAYING WHAT HE ASSERTS HE SAID...

Yet all we have is silence ... and Patrick's repeated assertions that he's an "honest" man.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again without any fear of refutation - there's no such thing as an honest knowledgeable believer in the Warren Commission's theory.

Anyone who honesty accepts the Warren Commission is simply ignorant of the actual case evidence.

Patrick cannot refute this...

[Patrick C]

Ben Holmes Wrote:Amusingly, Patrick still refuses to quote what Malcolm Kilfuff actually said..."

He lied when he claimed that Kilduff said that Dr. Perry was "his source on the head wound."

You are a freeking fruit case Ben.

How many more times !!!

Kilduff said it WAS PERRY in 1991.
Kilduff said it WAS BURKLEY on 22 nov 1963 .....

Are you really and truly that dumb.....or do you have some kind of pathalogical psychosis........?

Getting much traffic on the web site Ben....would that be a NO......

Bye Bye Benny Boy....

[Ben Holmes]

(11-09-2016, 08:14 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:Amusingly, Patrick still refuses to quote what Malcolm Kilfuff actually said..."

He lied when he claimed that Kilduff said that Dr. Perry was "his source on the head wound."

You are a freeking fruit case Ben.

How many more times !!!

How many more times will you refuse to support your lie?

I don't know... as many times as you dare to try to defend it, I suppose...

(11-09-2016, 08:14 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Kilduff said it WAS PERRY in 1991.

Nope. You're lying again.

It would be simple to just quote what he said to defend yourself - but you once again refuse to do so.

(11-09-2016, 08:14 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Kilduff said it WAS BURKLEY on 22 nov 1963 .....

Yep... as I've REPEATEDLY pointed out... and both you and Henry have denied it... either explicitly or implicitly.

(11-09-2016, 08:14 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Are you really and truly that dumb.....or do you have some kind of pathalogical psychosis.........

It's not "dumb" to point out lies, Patrick.

(11-09-2016, 08:14 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Getting much traffic on the web site Ben....would that be a NO......

Bye Bye Benny Boy....

You have no choice but to run away again, Patrick. You're just too dishonest to simply retract your lie.

[Patrick C]

I see you still fail to understand the point that Kilduff stated two different sources of info some 28 years apart. Nothing to do with me. That you attribute in some bizzare way any connection to me on that fact defies logic.

Not a point you will understand of course.

Pip Pip

[Ben Holmes]

(11-11-2016, 04:54 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  I see you still fail to understand the point that Kilduff stated two different sources of info some 28 years apart. Nothing to do with me. That you attribute in some bizzare way any connection to me on that fact defies logic.

Not a point you will understand of course.

Pip Pip

You're lying again, Patrick.

And, of course, you prove that yet again by STILL REFUSING TO QUOTE WHAT MALCOLM KILDUFF REALLY SAID!
 

You're quite the coward, aren't you Patrick?