[Ben Holmes]

It's been nearly a week... Patrick Collins simply refuses to retract or support the obvious lies he tells. This is not a 'matter of opinion'... 

Dr. Baden made a statement CONTRADICTED by the Autopsy Report.

Patrick wants to have it both ways - he's unwilling to argue that the Autopsy Report is wrong, YET HE CLAIMS THAT DR. BADEN WAS RIGHT WHEN HE CONTRADICTED THE AUTOPSY REPORT!!

But Patrick's silence was not unexpected... Patrick, Henry, Anderson, Dale, David Von Pein, (and undoubtedly others I don't recall) have ALL EXHIBITED THIS SAME BEHAVIOR - when caught in a blatant lie, they have the tendency to simply disappear for long periods of time, days, weeks, even months...

But if and when Patrick dares to return, he'd better be prepared to explain why he thinks Dr. Baden is correct in stating that "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area...", yet argues that the Autopsy Report is correct in it's placement of the large wound.

Here's just one of the posts that Patrick is running from:
 

(09-17-2016, 04:45 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:Patrick - TELL US WHERE THE LARGE WOUND ON JFK'S HEAD WAS...

Use medical terminology, and be as accurate as you can.

If you DARE to use the terms Parietal or Occipital - you'll have proven yourself a liar.

The answer is clearly stated in the autopsy report

Quote:There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right
involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the
temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.

Yep... you're a liar, Patrick. You state that Dr. Baden was "Baden is quite correct of course..." when he said "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said."
 

(09-17-2016, 04:45 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:If you DARE to use the terms Parietal or Occipital - you'll have proven yourself a liar.

It is clear that I am dealing with a very strange and mixed up mind here. What kind of  absolute tripe is that. 

Those terms are in the medical report so it is impossible for me to be a liar on that matter - do you not understand that!

What a waste of time. That is about my hour up I think.

You claim it's impossible for you to be a liar - YET YOU PROVABLY DID LIE!!! You claimed that Dr. Baden was "quite correct."

Then instead of answering my last post - YOU POSTED AS IF IT DIDN'T EVEN APPEAR HERE!

Here's the post you ran from:

Ben Holmes Wrote:You're lying again, Patrick!

Dr. Baden stated that "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said."

You asserted that Dr. Baden was "Baden is quite correct of course..."

Then you contradict what he said.

Who has problems with the English language?

I'll make it real easy for you... you stated that Dr. Baden was correct...

WAS DR. BADEN CORRECT WHEN HE STATED THAT: "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said."?

Now why couldn't you answer the question?

WHY ARE YOU SUCH A COWARD, PATRICK?