[Ben Holmes]

(08-23-2016, 01:51 PM)Guest Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:So why are you willing to make assertions that you can't support?

I could support them Ben, I just can't be bothered. I am not really interested in discussing the case with you. Got the T shirt for that one.

Funny how often I get similar responses...

The truth, of course, is that you absolutely CANNOT support your claims.

Pretending, for example, that a majority of the witnesses documented on 11/22 and 11/23 didn't point to the Grassy Knoll is simply a lie.

You KNOW it's a lie.

You pretend that you simply can't be bothered to take the time to document the contrary implication...

I have checked out the list of people, I know for a fact that it's a lie to claim that the majority pointed to the TSBD.

(08-23-2016, 01:51 PM)Guest Wrote:  About the rail yards and the Grassy Knoll......if you were by the TSBD doorway, I doubt you could tell the difference no, maybe the far south western end of the yards yes.

You have, as I recall, already admitted this.

This proves that the McAdams' tabulation isn't correct.

(08-23-2016, 01:51 PM)Guest Wrote:  But who cares, the only shots came from the TSBD, so it matters not.

You're entitled to your opinion - you aren't entitled to your own "facts."

(08-23-2016, 01:51 PM)Guest Wrote:  As for Lane's witnesses.....did they all (was it 22 of them)....say ALL the shots came from the front.....? Keep on dreaming Ben.

Clearly you don't even know what Mark Lane said.

Nor are you willing to defend the lies you tell in this forum.

Those facts tell the tale, don't they?