[Ben Holmes]

(08-02-2016, 03:05 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-02-2016, 02:11 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-02-2016, 09:32 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  Come on. You've realized, to your horror no doubt, that there's no objective support for your Chaney theory, so you're desperately trying to turn this into a discussion about pixels. How pathetic.

How silly... YOU and Patrick both admit that Chaney was closer to Altgens than the other cops. That's evidence for the fact that Chaney is right where you see him in the photo.

Not even close! 

You're lying again, Mark.

I stated that both you and Patrick admit that Chaney was closer.

THAT IS A FACT!

You cannot refute that fact with a lie.

That he's closer is evidence for the fact that Chaney is right where you see him in the photo.

Again, simply irrefutable by your mere statement...

You cannot deny that you see Chaney right where I put him - next to JFK. You cannot deny that Chaney himself implies that this is where he was. You cannot deny that the evidence supports that...

Stick with the evidence, Mark. It'll never let you down...