[Mark Ulrik]

(08-05-2016, 01:30 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-05-2016, 08:20 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  Yep... you "estimated" Altgen's position, and fail to understand how critical that measurement actually is to your argument.

And you've ADMITTED that you don't understand.

I understand more about the Altgens photo than you ever will. (I know it sounds like bragging, but it's frankly a rather modest accomplishment.)

It doesn't surprise me that you were unwilling to state the speed of the limo. Would you agree that it's traveling in excess of 40 mph by the time it goes under the overpass?

Perhaps it was. But did the cars in front of Chaney maintain that speed all the way to Parkland, or is it possible that they make a brief stop west of the triple underpass, allowing Chaney to catch up?

My comments in green above.

I see my statement about your ignorance of the distance factor is still unrefuted.

How am I supposed to refute something that exists only in your imagination?

You ADMITTED that you didn't understand how Altgens' distance from the limo would affect your graphics and analysis.

Quote me, or admit you're just making things up.

I do.

And unless you can document the distance that Altgens was from the limo - all your arguments are meaningless.

The sightlines don't lie, Ben. I placed him in almost exactly the same spot as Cutler did, and close to where Roberdeau and others have put him. Roberdeau is a member here, by the way, so why don't you ask him what he thinks of your Chaney theory? As I've pointed out many times before, my argument doesn't depend on whether you place Chaney 20% or 25% closer (than Hargis) to Altgens.

Since Chaney is STILL closer to Altgens than the other cops, this supports the fact that Chaney is right where we see him.

Which is behind the limo.

I find it amusing that you're too much the coward to state publicly what the speed of the limo was as it went under the overpass.

And you're too much of a coward to acknowledge the possibility that the cars in front of Chaney made a brief stop west of the overpass.

So the entire topic of Chaney's conversation with Curry is one you don't want to touch - I can understand that.

It has nothing to do with the Altgens photo or the Z film. But I can understand why you desperately want to change the subject.

My comments in green above.