[Ben Holmes]

Garry Puffer Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:

Garry Puffer Wrote:The photo on the left below is undoubtedly an interesting fake. I am suspicious because the noise in the photo would probably cover up any manipulation. Besides, why should there be so much noise anyway?

I post this only as part of an ongoing discussion about the photos.
BYPs.jpg

Subject to correction (as I'm going by memory here...) But I'm under the impression that the photo on the right was 'discovered' in the 90's... and the one on the left was known back in 193-64 time period as a DPD 'recreation' photo.

Demonstrating that the DPD knew about the photo on the right back in 1963.

That's the story as I recall it, but I can't cite anything off the top of my head...

Perhaps, but please notice that the bodies are exactly the same, down to folds in clothing, fingers, etc., so it's kind of hard to believe a recreation was that exact, don't you think?

Ah! I see what you're getting at. Now that I pay attention to the background... I'd certainly like to see the originals, but I'm guessing that if both are authentic, and not forgeries, it would pretty much prove that the BY photos are fraudulent.

(If you can correctly untangle that sentence! )

Subject to viewing real photos (and not online images), I'd have to agree, it's downright impossible to match the backgrounds so perfectly...

Mark Ulrik claims interest in the photographic evidence - let's see if he'll weigh in.