[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:It could have come from higher and been deflected by the glass....

Personally I find the notion of a frontal shot through the windshield with other people in the way from a low vantage point rather an ill conceived plan in the first place - granted one might say that the plan was not necessarily to fire through the glass......it just happened that way.......

Sheer speculation.

You've been handed your head on the origin point of this shot, and you're quite desperately clinging to having a shooter on top of the overpass...

It's understandable why you want to put a shooter there... because such a location is patently silly.

This actually is a good example of how WCR Supporters filter the evidence... rather than allowing the evidence to show you what happened - you filter everything through your 'established fact' that Lee Harvey Oswald, alone; shot JFK. Time and time again, Supporters are unable to accept the actual evidence, and must try to massage the data to get their desired result.

There is, of course, even more evidence that the shot went through the windshield on it's way to JFK's throat. I'm quite sure you're aware of the evidence for "shrapnel" wounds in JFK's face... You have no explanation for it... that JFK was shot through the windshield naturally explains it. How much would you care to bet that had those wounds been dissected, they'd have found a tiny piece of windshield glass in the skin?