Patrick C Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:I'm quite sure you're aware of the evidence for "shrapnel" wounds in JFK's face... You have no explanation for it...
No evidence at all for wounds to the face and I have NEVER read that before either. That said I do not claim to have read everything on the case - far from it.
Then you've been schooled.
Joe West interviewed mortician Thomas Evan Robinson - one of the JFK embalmers, here's his notes from that phone interview:
Patty C Wrote:As for the low level shot - I have not been handed my head on a plate at all. It is my OPINION only that your suggested location is not a good one. I have been there too. I lived in Dallas for several months and know every inch of the plaza (or did).
Yet you can't explain the trajectory.
There's no possible way that a shooter on top of the overpass could have hit the windshield with a bullet that went on to hit JFK in the throat.
The trajectory is an obvious one, and the only thing you can do is complain that the windshield hole didn't exist, and that the evidence for wounds in JFK's face you didn't know about.
Patrick C Wrote:Plus there was NO hole in the windshield - there was a crack. We have been through this before.
This is certainly the official claim. But you know, and I know - that there's considerable eyewitness testimony otherwise. A fact you cannot deny.