[Garry Puffer]

Ben Holmes Wrote:

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:No evidence at all for wounds to the face and I have NEVER read that before either.

Joe West interviewed mortician Thomas Evan Robinson - one of the JFK embalmers, here's his notes from that phone interview:

  Robinson.png (Size: 18.5 KB / Downloads: 235)

I was aware of those notes, but I have always had the view he was describing an additional wound on the right temple which was a next to the tear he describes

Me:
See, Patrick, this is why Ben keeps telling you you're lying. First you tell us you have never heard any evidence of shrapnel wounds to JFK's face, which is fine - you can't be aware of everything - but then when Ben provides the evidence, you tell us you were aware of the notes but presumed the mortician was wrong. Please note, though, in your explanation you refer to a singular wound. How can that morph into "wounds," plural, as in the notes? You are avoiding the shrapnel wounds here, and off topic in discussing the right temple wound. Plus the notes specify shrapnel wounds to the face.

But what is your basis for presuming he was wrong? I submit that once again you are begging the question.