Patrick C Wrote:I was aware of those notes, but I have always had the view he was describing an additional wound on the right temple which was a next to the tear he describes - caused by the fatal bullet exiting the side of the head.
Then you've been caught lying again. You stated: "
No evidence at all for wounds to the face and I have NEVER read that before either."
Yet now you admit that there is evidence for wounds to the face, and that you HAVE read this before.
Astonishing how easy it is to catch believers in lies.