[Ben Holmes]

'An Anonymous Believer Wrote:There is yet another reason why Oswald’s statement that he was on the first floor eating lunch at the time of the shooting makes no sense at all. If he had been, once he heard the shots and the screaming and all the commotion outside, if he were innocent, what is the likelihood that he would have proceeded to go, as he claims, up to the second floor to get himself a Coke? How could any sensible person believe a story like that? 

Vinny Bugliosi Reclaiming History 

Sadly, this is what Bugliosi does time and time again. Presume Oswald's guilt, then use any and all actions as "proof" of that guilt.

Bugliosi is just upset that Oswald didn't rush the Grassy Knoll as so many others did.

And he's just indicted everyone who were still INSIDE the TSBD as guilty murderers... yet refuses to name them.

Believers keep quoting Bugliosi, as if he were the ultimate authority - yet each time I show how Bugliosi can be credibly and reasonably answered... all you hear from believers is crickets...

Such cowards!!!

P.S. This was also posted to the alt.assassination.jfk forum where I found the original post. Anyone care to place a bet on whether anyone will dare answer?