[Ben Holmes]

(10-15-2016, 02:42 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:"that he would come for the weekend." - this one little snippet belies the notion that Oswald had some sort of nefarious plan that would prevent him from visiting Marina – HE WAS PLANNING ON DOING SO.

All that means is that Oswald said he would come back for the weekend. What would you expect him to say...."no I won't be back as I am planning on shooting the president"....?

It could be the case that he planned on coming back over the weekend, but changed his mind and decided to get his gun and take a pot shot at Kennedy.....

Your post in meaningless, though thanks for reminding me that Marina had stated Lee said he would be back. I had forgot that snippet.

In science, as I'm sure you're quite well aware, a theory that cannot be falsified is meaningless. (See Karl Popper).

Equally, a theory that explains everything ... explains nothing.

Your theory is equally at home with Oswald planning to return on the weekend, or not planning to return on the weekend.

It doesn't matter WHAT the evidence shows, your theory can be modified to explain it.

So while my post showing the sillyness of Vincent Bugliosi's claimed evidence of guilt is quite unrefuted by you, your theory is shown to be quite non-falsifiable.

You lose.