Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
RE: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #7 Refuted.
(10-24-2016, 11:59 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: (10-24-2016, 07:30 PM)Patrick C Wrote: (10-24-2016, 01:36 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: (10-23-2016, 03:06 PM)Patrick C Wrote: He could have put the lunch bag within the rifle bag. If I were carrying two packages to work and one was much larger than the other, I would probably put the smaller one inside the larger one.
Was Marina ever asked if there was evidence Lee made his lunch in the Paine's kitchen.
Oswald could have run out to get a sandwich on Elm St. I asked Mary Ferrell if there were cafes or sandwhich bars and deli type places near the TSBD in 1963 and she said yes within a minutes walk or so......
I assume a catering service is like a small van outside or a delivery guy with a tray full of options in the lobby....
This is a perfect example of a believer using his faith to speculate about the evidence needed to support his faith.
You "assume" what the evidence is, rather than actually examine the REAL evidence...
Well of course we have NO IDEA where Oswald got his lunch from do we Ben, so speculation is the ONLY option....
DUH !!!!!!!
Where do you people come from.....?
And the real evidence simply doesn't support your faith.
Indeed, it contradicts your faith.
I don't need to speculate... the evidence is on my side.
"Well of course we have NO IDEA where Oswald got his lunch from do we Ben, so speculation is the ONLY option...."
We were talking about where Oswald got his lunch.
I am correct in stating we do not know.
Therefore we can only speculate and there are some obvious options.
Your answer that the "evidence is on my side" makes no logical sense in response to the above.
We do not have the evidence to show where Oswald got his lunch. All we know is that he did not have a visible lunch bag that morning according to Frazier and that he did when he rode in on Monday mornings after his usual weekend visits.