Posts: 955
Threads:276
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
35
Stance Critic
RE: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #9 Refuted.
(10-31-2016, 05:11 PM)Patrick C Wrote: (10-30-2016, 08:52 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: (10-25-2016, 07:13 PM)Lee Abbott Wrote: Patrick, as usual, is in Fairy Tale Land where residents invent excuses... Who in the workd was watching Oswald's every move during his 5 weeks as a loner at the TSBD? In other words, who's to say what was "normal" for him on that Friday, as opposed to any other day?
Nor will Patrick tell us who read the paper on a regular basis there at the TSBD.
This is simply the common tactic used by believers - presuming Oswald's guilt, and the truthfulness of a Lone Assassin, then twisting anything and everything into supporting those presumptions.
Trying to explain the REAL evidence is something they cannot do.
Ben Holmes Wrote:Trying to explain the REAL evidence is something they cannot do.
Excellent summation of the rather more extreme pro conspiracy angles Lee.....
As is usual - Patrick demonstrates his cowardice by refusing to answer who else read the newspaper in the TSBD... or more importantly, who did not.
But of course, I've already pointed out that trying to explain the REAL evidence is something Patrick cannot do. And rather than refute that statement, Patrick merely substantiates it...