[Ben Holmes]

From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April 20th, 1964:

Quote:"Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John Ely at my request made in late February or early March.

My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
...
On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service.  Our depositions and examination of records and other data disclose that there are details in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in some instances, omission."
...

Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ... WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES, OMISSION."

Now, since believers FREQUENTLY claim that Mark Lane is a "liar" based on the claim that he "omitted" something - can believers now admit that the Warren Commission lied?

(Of course, none will...)

[Ben Holmes]

Patrick didn't want to admit the obvious, that based on the same claim about Mark Lane, the Warren Commission was lying.

Nor does he want to refute that believers have historically claimed that omission is lying... because he knows I'm ready with citations that prove otherwise.