[Ben Holmes]

Garry Puffer Wrote:I find it interesting that when informed that this is incorrect, that the official government position is "probably a conspiracy," the LNers come back with something like this:

"But the HSCA conclusion was based on the audio evidence which was later debunked."

Leaving aside the truth of such a "debunking," it is amazing that they believe the official conclusion can be overridden by a few "experts" offering a different opinion on the audio evidence. Somehow, magically, the official position is negated and reverts to the previous official opinion.

Regardless of what one believes about the audio evidence, it just doesn't work like that.

Indeed correct! It doesn't work that way...

Most people instinctively realize that when you indict the capability of someone at one moment - it tells you something about that person in a more general fashion.

If you catch someone lying to you - you know that you will have to be more careful in judging what they tell you.

Believers accept that the Government failed to draw the correct conclusions from an investigation that was much longer, and included all the information gained from the first few investigations.

Yet they believe that the government failed... and if the government failed, on what basis do they believe that the government got it right???

This is a philosophical question that will never be touched by believers...