[Ben Holmes]

(10-30-2016, 06:16 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Study the case for the SBT on DVP's web site - counter the points and I will respond - civily.

The SBT is a focus for me - though I must be honest and say even though your style is very different to mine and I acknowledge your knowledge of the case, I am really just not that interested in Dallas 22 11 63 these days.

Hence it is more stimulating for me to jibe than it is to discuss the case.

You know full well that nothing anyone says to you will change your mind - that your mind is set - unless new info comes out.

I feel the same way on the lone gunman stance.

The fact that one's "mind" will only be changed by evidence is what any honest person would assert. You refuse to acknowledge the existing evidence...

You claim that you'll address the SBT... so here's a quote from DVP's site:

Quote:Based on the official evidence in the John F. Kennedy murder case, all of the following things are true:

1.) President John F. Kennedy and Texas Governor John B. Connally were shot by rifle bullets in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on Friday, November 22, 1963.

2.) Lee Harvey Oswald's Mannlicher-Carcano rifle (Serial Number C2766) was located inside a building which overlooked the assassination site (the Texas School Book Depository) when JFK and JBC were being wounded by gunfire.

Now, either prove that the Mannlicher-Carcano, C2766 belonged to Oswald, or admit that this is mere speculation on DVP's part in claiming that the MC belonged to Oswald.

You may start by demonstrating that Oswald PAID for the rifle.

Either show the endorsements on the money order, or admit that there's no evidence that Oswald paid for the rifle.

I predict that despite your claim that you'd debate this issue, you'll run away.