[Ben Holmes]

(10-08-2016, 06:27 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  The wound was parietal extending somewhat into the temporal and occiptal plates.

That you feel that you don't have answer to your question, despite the fact that I have answered it twice, is of no interest to me and of no consequence to a study of the case. It is mere self indulgent tedium on your part Ben.

Cheerio.

Here's the question again: When Dr. Baden stated: "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said," was he telling the truth?

Simply cut & paste your answer to this question.

You can't, of course, BECAUSE YOU'RE LYING ABOUT HAVING ANSWERED IT.

When Dr. Baden stated: "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said," was he telling the truth?

It's a simple "yes" or "no" question...

Will you demonstrate yet again your inability to read?

And your proven cowardice?

Or will you answer the question?