08-05-2016, 12:01 AM
(08-04-2016, 11:24 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote: [ -> ](08-04-2016, 02:40 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: [ -> ](08-04-2016, 10:15 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote: [ -> ](08-03-2016, 03:05 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: [ -> ](08-03-2016, 12:16 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote: [ -> ]Ben's desperation is showing. Heindell's nickname may have inspired Oswald, but that does not make J. R. Heindel = A. J. Hidell.
Mr. Jenner quite clearly implied this.
Tell us Mark, was Mr. Jenner lying?
Indeed, it's YOUR desperation that is clearly being shown by your refusal to cite evidence, and address the cited evidence. Why is that, Mark?
Silly. He was showing interest in a name. How can that possibly be interpreted as lying?
Good of you to admit that Mr. Jenner specifically referred to a name that the Warren Commission claimed had no evidence of existence.
Once again, a provable lie on the part of the Warren Commission lies unrefuted...
They couldn't find an actual person named A. J. Hidell (an alias used by L. H. Oswald). They did, however, identify a man whose nickname may have inspired Oswald.
The Warren Commission didn't say that they couldn't find an "actual person".
They lied and stated that there was no evidence for "Hidell".
Amusing that no believer can admit this.