Forums

Full Version: WC Lied About Part 3!
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
An excellent example of the Warren Commission flat lying about the evidence is the missing "Part 3" of Oswald's Dallas Post Office Box form. According to the Warren Commission:
 
Quote:It is not known whether the application for post office box 2915 listed "A. Hidell" as a person entitled to receive mail at this box. In accordance with postal regulations, the portion of the application which lists names of persons, other than the applicant, entitled to receive mail was thrown away after the box was closed on May 1963.

But that was an out and out lie... In Commission Exhibit 2585 - the FBI states that:
 
Quote:INVESTIGATION: Our investigation has revealed that Oswald did not indicate on his application that others, including an "A. Hidell," would receive mail through the box in question, which was Post Office Box 2915 in Dallas. This box was obtained by Oswald on October 9, 1962, and relinquished by him on May 14, 1963.

Amusingly, not a SINGLE believer has ever publicly acknowledged that the Warren Commission flat lied even a single time, let alone the multiple times that critics have pointed out.

Why does the "truth" need lies to support it?