Forums

The autopsy reported stated that:

Quote:1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.

Believers often think that this doesn't mean that the wound was in the back of the head... despite the fact that dozens of medically trained witnesses reported that it was.

So I keep trying to find any believer honest enough to admit that a wound that is in the BACK of the head fits this Autopsy Report description.

David Von Pein has been quite dishonest in the past on this issue... we are about to see Patrick Collins follow David's path, and lie about this location as well.

I keep challenging believers to describe what portion of the Parietal is in the back of the head - and none of them seem willing to answer. So I've drawn a line from the extreme top of a skull - and it's quite clear, I hope; which is the front, and which is the back.
 

The Parietal is, of course, in green...

Now, I wonder if Patrick, or any other believer for that matter - can publicly answer the question... what percentage of the Parietal is in the BACK OF THE HEAD?

And, presuming for the sake of argument that the witnesses were correct in their placement of the wounds...
 

Get ready...

Here's the question...

Given that presumption - does the Autopsy Report ACCURATELY reflect that?

Now, I know that Patrick sometimes has a hard time understanding American English... so let me put it as precisely as I can... if one presumes that the above witnesses were accurate in their placement of the wound - is the Autopsy Report's description inconsistent IN ANY WAY with those witnesses?

My prediction... Patrick will refuse to answer.

And indeed, Patrick refused to answer.

His cowardice simply goes to show that he's well aware of the weakness of his case - the faith he has forces him to the dishonesty and cowardice that I would not expect to find in general.

Patrick might well be honest in all other dealings in life - but when it comes to his faith in the Warren Commission - he's provably a dishonest coward.

And, in his unsupportable claims of what others have said - quite despicable.

David Von Pein is in the same boat - he also refused to answer the questions that would put the words in his mouth that contradict his faith.

I rather suspect that this is why I'm so despised among the faithful - I make the attempt to force believers to say what they know is true... and they just hate that!

Patrick knows that the Autopsy Report doesn't contradict the location of the wound as shown in the above photos - but it's an impossible task to force him to admit it.