One of the frequent posters who support the Warren Commission's theory is someone who uses the name "Barton Paul Levenson".
In April of last year, he posted this:
Barton Paul Levenson Wrote:California, which produces 25% of American produce, will be uninhabitable in one year. Two years at the most. The rest of the US will have to resettle 39 million people. (original post here.)
Living in California, naturally this "prediction" is of great interest to me. Sadly, I've seen no efforts getting started to resettle any Californians...
Nor have I seen any other believer castigating Mr. Levenson for this
absolutely kooky statement...
This is common among believers - they won't correct fellow believers.
Critics, on the other hand; rarely have any problems correcting other critics - because we are dealing with facts - not speculation and opinion.
In the case of Mr. Levenson's prediction regarding California's future exidus, I's like to point out that Moses' 11th Commandment was, "Thou shalt not contradict anyone named Barton."
Barton Paul Levenson Wrote:California, which produces 25% of American produce, will be uninhabitable in one year. Two years at the most. The rest of the US will have to resettle 39 million people.
I wonder what he bases his belief on.......whatever it is that is quite simply bonkers.
Unless he is predicting a major quake of course, but even then, CA is a very large land mass and nature does not honour US state boundaries - so even in principle it is a stupid statement.
(09-15-2016, 08:08 PM)Patrick C Wrote: [ -> ]Barton Paul Levenson Wrote:California, which produces 25% of American produce, will be uninhabitable in one year. Two years at the most. The rest of the US will have to resettle 39 million people.
I wonder what he bases his belief on.......whatever it is that is quite simply bonkers.
Unless he is predicting a major quake of course, but even then, CA is a very large land mass and nature does not honour US state boundaries - so even in principle it is a stupid statement.
I'm amused that you'd comment without researching that question... which would be as simple as clicking on a link.
But everyone is no doubt waiting for your description of the location of the large head wound that JFK had...
You've asserted that it's not in the Parietal-Occipital - yet you seem strangely reluctant to tell everyone where it was.
Until you answer, I'll be highlighting this cowardice of yours...
Ben Holmes Wrote:I'm amused that you'd comment without researching that question... which would be as simple as clicking on a link.
Why would I waste time researching that question? I don't give a monkeys!
(09-17-2016, 11:58 AM)Patrick C Wrote: [ -> ]Ben Holmes Wrote:I'm amused that you'd comment without researching that question... which would be as simple as clicking on a link.
Why would I waste time researching that question? I don't give a monkeys!
And yet, you've twice now taken the time to post on this issue. You've already spent more time on this thread than it would have taken to merely click the link.
Are you actually thinking that your excuses are credible?
I did not see the link actually.....but I am not really interested in what he has t say about California.
(09-17-2016, 04:34 PM)Patrick C Wrote: [ -> ]I did not see the link actually.....but I am not really interested in what he has t say about California.
Yep... it was so hard to see.... (original post
here.)
For someone who keeps complaining about the ability of others to read - you sure demonstrate a consistent problem yourself.
Tell us Patrick, why do you have to be challenged to reject silliness posted by other believers? This isn't the first time this has been remarked on...
But just for the fun of it, I'm going to force you to run away, and not deal with this post... and I'll do it by merely quoting your words:
Patrick C Wrote:It is s shame in some respects that people like Ben Holmes give many of the well intentioned pro conspiracy supporters a bad name with his 7 shot, 5 shooter scenario with mobile film lab and metal detector team for all those missed bullets.....
Why can't you support this blatant lie of yours, Patrick?
Why would an honest man not retract what he knows isn't true?