09-19-2016, 04:19 PM
Henry Sienzant Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:Getting back to the evidence... a thing that believers HATE:
Quote:No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building." (WCR 61)
Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America *does* accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply lying.
Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as you claim.
You're lying again, Henry.
More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.
Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?
This is an EXTREMELY common tactic that WCR Supporter's use... they simply twist and lie about what critics say. Henry knows I said no such thing - yet what I did say is indisputable...
This is merely one of a number of quite dishonest debate tactics that believers utilize to avoid the truth.