10-09-2016, 04:52 PM
(10-08-2016, 06:27 PM)Patrick C Wrote: [ -> ]The wound was parietal extending somewhat into the temporal and occiptal plates.
That you feel that you don't have answer to your question, despite the fact that I have answered it twice, is of no interest to me and of no consequence to a study of the case. It is mere self indulgent tedium on your part Ben.
Cheerio.
Here's the question again: When Dr. Baden stated: "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said," was he telling the truth?
Simply cut & paste your answer to this question.
You can't, of course, BECAUSE YOU'RE LYING ABOUT HAVING ANSWERED IT.
When Dr. Baden stated: "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said," was he telling the truth?
It's a simple "yes" or "no" question...
Will you demonstrate yet again your inability to read?
And your proven cowardice?
Or will you answer the question?