10-30-2016, 07:35 PM
(10-30-2016, 06:30 PM)Patrick C Wrote: [ -> ]Ignoring the liar comments....
I can understand that... it must be irritating indeed to have your lies and cowardice constantly being pointed out.
You keep making claims that you refuse to support. Quite the coward, eh Patrick?
(10-30-2016, 06:30 PM)Patrick C Wrote: [ -> ]Anyone who saw JFK with a wound to his head would have known it was a bullet that caused it.
A completely out of the park statement - having absolutely NOTHING to do with anything that precedes this post.
I'll let you fight this strawman by yourself...
(10-30-2016, 06:30 PM)Patrick C Wrote: [ -> ]I did some numbers on this in the 80s with Mary Ferrell and we estimated that around 50 people would have seen the head wound between the Ambulance bay and Trauma Room 1 - minimum - this includes the 20+ Parkland staff, SS agents and other hospital staff in the car park area and corridor......
22 T1 staff as I recall.....so 50 is probably conservative.
Completely irrelevant to your lie that Dr. Perry was the source of Kilduff's description of the wounds. Ditto with Henry's claim that I'd said that Kilduff got his information from viewing the body.
This is really simple, Patrick - Henry lied, you lied.
I'm the only one who can immediately cite for what I state that the evidence is - and what it shows.
Malcolm Kilduff got his information about the wounds on JFK's body from Dr. Burkley - and no amount of lying on this issue is going to change that fact.