Forums

Isn't it fascinating the way LNers can "know" Oswald is guilty without him having had a chance to go to trial? Legally, you cannot even speak about a criminal as if they're a criminal until they've been proven guilty. There's a reason for that.

Most sensible people would also regard any investigation as biased based on what the investigators want you to see or not see. Yet how strange...that LNers just...."know."

Very obviously the mock Bugliosi/Gerry Spence trial 20+ years after the fact is not what I'm talking about, and any LNer who mentions it in the same vein as any "real" trial is simply being dishonest and pretending they don't know what I mean.

The Warren Commission also "knew" Oswald was guilty before they had their first meeting.

The outline of their investigation has shown that they didn't even consider any other possibility other than that Oswald was the lone assassin.

But you can't find an honest believer who will publicly admit that fact.