01-02-2017, 04:04 PM
(32) After visiting him on Saturday, Marina came away convinced of Oswald's guilt.
What Bugliosi WON'T tell you is the testimony... here it is:
Now, this is wonderful nonsense... just the sort of stuff that would never be allowed into court. This is, at it's essence, merely Marina's OPINION. Based on nothing that she can pinpoint.
It's hardly the sort of evidence that Bugliosi would put forth if he actually had a strong case...
And the fact that believers absolutely REFUSE to defend all of these nonsensical bits of "evidence" after I refute them isn't a demonstration of some sort of genius on my part, but merely a demonstration of just how weak a case Bugliosi put together.
What Bugliosi WON'T tell you is the testimony... here it is:
Quote:Mr. RANKIN. When you saw your husband on November 23d, at the police station, did you ask him if he had killed President Kennedy?
Mrs. OSWALD. No.
Mr. RANKIN. Did you ask him at that time if he had killed Officer Tippit?
Mrs. OSWALD. No. I said. "I don't believe that you did that, and everything will turn out well."
After all, I couldn't accuse him--after all, he was my husband.
Mr. RANKIN. And what did he say to that?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said that I should not worry, that everything would turn out well. But I could see by his eyes that he was guilty. Rather, he tried t appear to be brave. However, by his eyes I could tell that he was afraid. This was just a feeling. It is hard to describe.
Mr. RANKIN. Would you help us a little bit by telling us what you saw i his eyes that caused you to think that?
Mrs. OSWALD. He said goodbye to me with his eyes. I knew that. He said that everything would turn out well, but he did not believe it himself.
Mr. RANKIN. How could you tell that?
Mrs. OSWALD. I saw it in his eyes.
Now, this is wonderful nonsense... just the sort of stuff that would never be allowed into court. This is, at it's essence, merely Marina's OPINION. Based on nothing that she can pinpoint.
It's hardly the sort of evidence that Bugliosi would put forth if he actually had a strong case...
And the fact that believers absolutely REFUSE to defend all of these nonsensical bits of "evidence" after I refute them isn't a demonstration of some sort of genius on my part, but merely a demonstration of just how weak a case Bugliosi put together.