The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] A non-numeric value encountered - Line: 499 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
|
A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found - Printable Version +- Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com) +-- Forum: Main JFK Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-Main-JFK-Forums) +--- Forum: JFK Whiteboard Area (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-JFK-Whiteboard-Area) +--- Thread: A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found (/Thread-A-way-to-PROVE-a-conspiracy-killed-President-Kennedy-has-been-found) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found - William Charleston - 06-26-2016 Nick Principe Wrote:William Charleston Wrote:The figure shows the last two shots were fired 0.7 seconds apart. Did any witnesses say they heard the last two shots closely spaced shots? Richard Charmin adds a few more in his blog: JFK: “Double Bang” Witness Testimony https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014/02/08/jfk-math-analysis-witness-testimony-of-time-interval-between-shots/ In this case, no matter how many witnesses say the last two shots were BANG-BANG, it is not sufficient to prove anything. But coupled with what the audio analysis tells us along with being able to see: Z Frame 313: President Kennedy was shot in the head Z Frame 325 ; (0.7 seconds after JFK's head shot) a shot fired from behind (TSBD shot #3) which missed JFK's head and hit Connally in the back Re: A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found - Nick Principe - 06-26-2016 William Charleston Wrote:no matter how many witnesses say the last two shots were BANG-BANG, it is not sufficient to prove anything. If that were true Oswaldist zealots would not deny it so vehemently. I used to attribute Connally's snap-forward motion to the limo braking suddenly, though it's clear none of the other passengers are affected by this, so you may have a point to that as well. And many thanks for the Charnin link. Re: A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found - Patrick C - 06-26-2016 "How did John Connally hold on to his hat if his right wrist was broken (I have heard the term shattered)?" John Connally held onto his hat all the way to Parkland. They had to prize it from his hand. Nelly Connally US day time TV circa 2003..... I admit I was surprised to hear that myself..... Re: A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found - Patrick C - 06-26-2016 "At this point I would NOT be surprised that your position is that 4.8 seconds between shots at (Z224/313 Zapruder film)=(Shot #3/ Shot #4 in the acoustical analysis) is a coincidence and means nothing." Absolutely it means nothing, the acoustics evidence is nonsense. "And I am quite sure you will cling to the lie that John Connally was shot in the back way before JFK was shot in the head." Your interpretation of the Z film is ridiculous and not worthy of serious discussion. I m looking forward to circulating it around a few authors I know - on both sides of the fence. I am not expecting any serious comments. Connally was shot at the same time as JFK when the same bullet passed through them both. Re: A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found - Patrick C - 06-26-2016 "The bullet entered his back and exited his chest, blowing away a portion of his rib (10 cm as I recall) and then exited his chest and broke his radius bone in his right wrist before then hitting his left thigh. If this is true, where is the blood on Connally's white shirt when you look at frame 266?" Very little of his shirt is visible. I would not expect blood to be noticeable on the collars and cuffs and nor should anyone. Re: A way to PROVE a conspiracy killed President Kennedy has been found - Ben Holmes - 06-26-2016 The Whiteboard is not designed for debate - but rather for the longer expositions of theory or facts. I will begin locking these topics before a long debate breaks out. |