miker Wrote:First of all, stop embedding all the quotes. Reading your posts is already hard enough. Make one quote at the beginning and thats it. You have a tendency , I am learning, to overdue EVERYTHING.

Ben Holmes Wrote:...you are not a critic of the HSCA in any traditionally accepted sense. My prediction is that you're really simply a supporter of the WCR, and wish to only "criticize" the "probable conspiracy" portion of the HSCA.

You want to fly under false colors...

You don't want your basic assumptions of the correctness of the Warren Commission to be known.

Time will tell if my prediction is correct.

Miker Wrote:Also, please remember that Larry Hancock gave you a seal of approval. You have an obligation to be somewhat sensible, otherwise, you are going to reflect poorly on Larry Hancock. Already I am thinking , is the kind of stuff that Larry Hancock wants to promote?

HSCA Wrote:In disagreement with the observations of the Parkland doctors are the 26 people present at the autopsy. All of those interviewed who attended the autopsy corroborated the general location of the wounds as depicted in the photographs; none had differing accounts.

Miker Wrote:You could not be more wrong about my being a HSCA critic. I am probably the biggest HSCA critic that you will ever find.

Miker Wrote:I am not going to respond to any of your questions, until I begin to see sensibility and not "bullying".

I have things and subjects that I want to bring up and maybe, if you stop being such a bully, I will get the chance to bring them up. You have your subjects you want to talk about. I have subjects I want to talk about. That is the way the world works.

I have absolutely no doubt that I could debate the pant off of you if I so desired, but I do not want to do that. The subjects you are interested in are not the subjects I am interested in. But you kind of made that clear yesterday when you refused to make a sub forum for Photographic Analysis.

Stop being a bully, and stop posting so much. I have not given up on you yet, but I am very close.

Ben Holmes Wrote:

miker Wrote:First of all, stop embedding all the quotes. Reading your posts is already hard enough. Make one quote at the beginning and thats it. You have a tendency , I am learning, to overdue EVERYTHING.

I have a 'tendency' for accuracy. I predicted that you'd end up being a traditional WCR Supporter... thus far, it looks like I'm correct.

Mark Ulrik Wrote:Also, please remember that Larry Hancock gave you a seal of approval. You have an obligation to be somewhat sensible, otherwise, you are going to reflect poorly on Larry Hancock. Already I am thinking , is the kind of stuff that Larry Hancock wants to promote?

You mean that you seriously think that Larry Hancock would *NOT* label this statement as a lie?

miker Wrote:So, you delete entire posts without saying a word."

miker Wrote:Its going to be one of those kind of forums.

miker Wrote:How many other posts from others have you deleted?

miker Wrote:Once you start deleting entire posts you have crossed the line.

It is always good to find these things out early, before a lot of energy and effort (and posts) have been put into a forum.

Good luck. You are going to need it.

BTW: I have made a picture of this post.

If you cannot debate fairly and you have to delete the posts which show you lost the debate, then what is the point?