The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] A non-numeric value encountered - Line: 499 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
|
The Backyard Photos - Printable Version +- Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com) +-- Forum: Main JFK Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-Main-JFK-Forums) +--- Forum: JFK Conspiracy Main Forum (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-JFK-Conspiracy-Main-Forum) +--- Thread: The Backyard Photos (/Thread-The-Backyard-Photos) |
Re: The Backyard Photos - Garry Puffer - 06-16-2016 Ben Holmes Wrote:Garry Puffer Wrote:The photo on the left below is undoubtedly an interesting fake. I am suspicious because the noise in the photo would probably cover up any manipulation. Besides, why should there be so much noise anyway? Perhaps, but please notice that the bodies are exactly the same, down to folds in clothing, fingers, etc., so it's kind of hard to believe a recreation was that exact, don't you think? Re: The Backyard Photos - Ben Holmes - 06-16-2016 Garry Puffer Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:Garry Puffer Wrote:The photo on the left below is undoubtedly an interesting fake. I am suspicious because the noise in the photo would probably cover up any manipulation. Besides, why should there be so much noise anyway? Ah! I see what you're getting at. Now that I pay attention to the background... I'd certainly like to see the originals, but I'm guessing that if both are authentic, and not forgeries, it would pretty much prove that the BY photos are fraudulent. (If you can correctly untangle that sentence! ) Subject to viewing real photos (and not online images), I'd have to agree, it's downright impossible to match the backgrounds so perfectly... Mark Ulrik claims interest in the photographic evidence - let's see if he'll weigh in. Re: The Backyard Photos - Garry Puffer - 06-16-2016 This is David Joseph's comment on the photo: "While Roscoe White’s involvement is an acceptable theory there are also other images of the BYP circulating the internet which suggest something else entirely. Sources which desire to remain nameless have suggested that there is another provenance for the BYPs... I was provided the following (on the left) and was also able to find it in an internet search. The images are identical except from the chin up. Many feel this too may be a False Flag trail keeping the true nature of the photo out of reach. Truth rea lly is stranger than Fiction." . For a critical view of the entire Roscoe White episode, see the essay“I Was Mandarin” <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.texasmonthly.com/story/i-was-mandarin">http://www.texasmonthly.com/story/i-was-mandarin</a><!-- m --> David Josephs' BYP article is at <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://ctka.net/2015/JosephsBYP.pdf">http://ctka.net/2015/JosephsBYP.pdf</a><!-- m --> Re: The Backyard Photos - Ben Holmes - 06-16-2016 Re: False Flags... Should critics come down hard on a particular conspiracy laden theory about the two photos - the CIA (through the media) would be able to 'yank the sheets away' - so to speak. I've long thought that a number of widely known "critics" are really false flag operations... so such a thought about these photos wouldn't be out of line. Re: The Backyard Photos - Garry Puffer - 06-16-2016 Ben Holmes Wrote:Re: False Flags... Could you expand on your thoughts, please? I'm not really following what you're saying here. Re: The Backyard Photos - Ben Holmes - 06-16-2016 Garry Puffer Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:Re: False Flags... Let me give you an example... Greer Shot JFK. A False Flag operation that had critics running in circles, and was easily shown to be the sheerest of nonsense. I'm not saying it was a false flag operation, only that it certainly looked like one. Every once in a while you see a document floating around that's just too good to be true... such as one that was asserting that Oswald was CIA. There's no reason a critic would create such a false document, but it's easy to see why believers, or intelligence agencies would do so. Perhaps I'm not really speaking of a 'False Flag' per se... Maybe the terminology should be different. But the JFK field is over-run with people who aren't honest & serious about what they are doing. Re: The Backyard Photos - Garry Puffer - 06-16-2016 Ah, I see what you mean. This photo is indeed too good to be true, which is another reason I'm suspicious of it. Josephs also refers to it as a "False Flag," and I guess that's kind of correct. We are supposed to jump on board and connect Roscoe White to the photos, which is a small step because we've already connected him. All I know is that I got the same chills when viewing this photo for the first time that Helen Markham got when viewing Number Two in the line-up. :roll: Re: The Backyard Photos - Garry Puffer - 06-18-2016 Here is an oddity. When the Carcano in the Backyard Photographs is compared to the Carcano in the National Archives, they do not appear to be the same weapon. What can explain this? [attachment=18] Re: The Backyard Photos - Patrick C - 06-18-2016 Wishful thinking on the conspiracy side....? Re: The Backyard Photos - Ben Holmes - 06-18-2016 Patrick C Wrote:Wishful thinking on the conspiracy side....? This recalls the statement made by Patrick regarding the two weapons seen in the Alyea film... wishful thinking turned one of them into part of a cardboard box. Patrick C Wrote:As for the pics (Alya film stills?) looks like a folded up cardboard box side on to me Holmes. As per your U Haul boxes before you put them together - it clearly has a fold in the middle as the object is not straight.....new glasses Holmes....? |