The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] A non-numeric value encountered - Line: 499 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
|
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #15 Refuted. - Printable Version +- Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com) +-- Forum: Main JFK Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-Main-JFK-Forums) +--- Forum: JFK Conspiracy Main Forum (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-JFK-Conspiracy-Main-Forum) +--- Thread: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #15 Refuted. (/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-15-Refuted) |
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #15 Refuted. - Ben Holmes - 11-10-2016 (15) It makes no sense that Oswald the "political animal" had no interest in the President's death. More speculation with no foundation at all. While I took the time to go and stand at the curb while President Reagan's hearse drove by, I had zero interest in going even a few blocks to see President Obama. Does this mean that if an assassin were to make an attempt on the President, that I'm a valid suspect? Once again, Bugliosi takes it as a matter of faith that Oswald was the lone assassin, then twists anything and everything he 'knows' about Oswald to 'prove' his guilt. RE: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #15 Refuted. - Ben Holmes - 12-08-2016 "Honest" Patrick again is silent. Looks like Vincent Bugliosi's '53 reasons' is sheerest garbage thus far... even believers refuse to defend them. |