The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] A non-numeric value encountered - Line: 499 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
|
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #32 Refuted. - Printable Version +- Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com) +-- Forum: Main JFK Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-Main-JFK-Forums) +--- Forum: JFK Conspiracy Main Forum (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-JFK-Conspiracy-Main-Forum) +--- Thread: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #32 Refuted. (/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-32-Refuted) |
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #32 Refuted. - Ben Holmes - 01-02-2017 (32) After visiting him on Saturday, Marina came away convinced of Oswald's guilt. What Bugliosi WON'T tell you is the testimony... here it is: Quote:Mr. RANKIN. When you saw your husband on November 23d, at the police station, did you ask him if he had killed President Kennedy? Now, this is wonderful nonsense... just the sort of stuff that would never be allowed into court. This is, at it's essence, merely Marina's OPINION. Based on nothing that she can pinpoint. It's hardly the sort of evidence that Bugliosi would put forth if he actually had a strong case... And the fact that believers absolutely REFUSE to defend all of these nonsensical bits of "evidence" after I refute them isn't a demonstration of some sort of genius on my part, but merely a demonstration of just how weak a case Bugliosi put together. |