The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] A non-numeric value encountered - Line: 499 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
|
![]() |
Another Single Bullet "Fact"... - Printable Version +- Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com) +-- Forum: Main JFK Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-Main-JFK-Forums) +--- Forum: JFK Conspiracy Main Forum (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-JFK-Conspiracy-Main-Forum) +--- Thread: Another Single Bullet "Fact"... (/Thread-Another-Single-Bullet-Fact) |
Another Single Bullet "Fact"... - Ben Holmes - 01-18-2017 Frank Warner Wrote:What was the “single-bullet theory”? Ever notice how believers keep asserting that it's now "proven fact" - yet never seem to show just how it was "proven?" Frank Warner is another coward who cannot debate in a forum where knowledgeable critics would point out his nonsense. The evidence didn't support the SBT back in November of 1963 - and nothing changed ... it's still a theory developed to avoid the only other possibility - that there was a conspiracy... multiple shooters. No transit was ever found during the autopsy - that's a fact that's unavoidable. Connally's wrist wound alone shows that there was no SBT. The "elliptical" back wound of Connally demonstrates that there was no SBT. But you can't find any believers willing to stand up and defend their nonsense. Why is that? |