The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning [2] A non-numeric value encountered - Line: 499 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33 (Linux)
|
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #35 Refuted. - Printable Version +- Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com) +-- Forum: Main JFK Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-Main-JFK-Forums) +--- Forum: JFK Conspiracy Main Forum (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-JFK-Conspiracy-Main-Forum) +--- Thread: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #35 Refuted. (/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-35-Refuted) |
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #35 Refuted. - Ben Holmes - 01-20-2017 (35) The three expended shells on the sixth floor were "fired in and ejected from" Oswald's rifle. This is simply not true. As Thompson pointed out long ago, and anyone can eyeball for themselves, CE543 doesn't have the characteristic 'chamber mark' that all other cartridges known to have been fired from CE2766 had. You can view CE543 on the left here: For anyone interested, you can also locate online photos of shells fired from the Mannlicher Carcano by the FBI after the assassination - which also have the same 'chamber mark'. Note again the dead silence coming from Warren Commission believers - who don't have any way to refute my refutation of Bugliosi's "evidence". |